<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stock tips from the Freak strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://investingfreak.com/2009/04/stock-tips-from-the-freak-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://investingfreak.com/2009/04/stock-tips-from-the-freak-strategy/</link>
	<description>Investing, market, stocks, money, economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:43:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://investingfreak.com/2009/04/stock-tips-from-the-freak-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investingfreak.com/?p=83#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I would put a BUY on UYG...  It&#039;s an ETF for the financials.  I believe they have started to recover.  And while this ETF may fall a bit after the stress test, I believe that this long term investment will be very beneficial in the next two - five years.  

I would also watch Ford (F).  I bought in December around $3 a share, thinking that they were going to be the ones to make it based on not taking gov&#039;t money.  So far, I&#039;m right...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would put a BUY on UYG&#8230;  It&#8217;s an ETF for the financials.  I believe they have started to recover.  And while this ETF may fall a bit after the stress test, I believe that this long term investment will be very beneficial in the next two &#8211; five years.  </p>
<p>I would also watch Ford (F).  I bought in December around $3 a share, thinking that they were going to be the ones to make it based on not taking gov&#8217;t money.  So far, I&#8217;m right&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
